What does it mean when we say that in blockchain, consensus determine the truth?
One definition of Consensus is: a general agreement –
and I would go on to add the word “between” -
between different beings (or “parties” – as in “parties to the agreement”).
In a blockchain recording of transactions,
the Reality or Truth concerning what transactions have Actually - Truly - Really taken place,
is PROVED by the consensus or consensual agreement -
(as dictated by the blockchain code which requires such agreement) -
between the results of the mathematical calculations of each computer (a “being”) on the bc network.
These mathematical calculations are happening/occuring according to the mathematical laws of physics –
PRIOR TO any human beliefs ABOUT them,
PRIOR TO any devious human intentions/abilities to coerce others into a non-True consensus,
for the purposes of deception.
– therefore, these mathematical calculations are a solid foundation upon which to provide
a general agreement - or CONSENSUS - about what actually exists - what IS - what IS TRUE / TRUTH.
How is this different from how truth is determined in a central database?
A central database could be considered to be “a law unto itself” – accountable to no other database,
perhaps accountable to no-other-anything-or-anyone other than 1 human being having control of/over
that database.
Therefore, whatever that potential single locus of control human being declares to be “Truth”,
must be accepted as so – whether it actually is so in “Reality” or not.