You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
An utxo is an unspent transaction output (not input) it’s a batch of bitcoins that is not yet spend. If the utxo is locked on your adresses, you can spend it by using this utxo in the input of a transaction, and change ownership in the output.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
Here we mean that you can use more addresses in the outputs, wich makes it hard to know if you are paying yourself or someone else. Only your private keys know wich addresses are yours.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
Each smaller utxo will be 1 different input.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
You can always combine smaller utxo’s together in your inputs to cover for the amount. Only if the sum of all your available utxo’s aren’t enough to cover for your transaction, the transaction will fail.
I see what you are saying, but I didn’t mean that the UTXO is an input so let me maybe rather clarify my question so I know if I’m on the right page — If someone sends you the transaction, for them that is the output.
For you it’s the input at that stage?
It’s only a UTXO for you once you have an input from someone else and didn’t spend it yet?
(Because you can’t have a UTXO if you never received any inputs. i.e. If I just set up a new wallet and I don’t have inputs I can’t have any UTXOs)
That’s what I was trying to say, but let me know if I missed something.
Thank you for the clarification
1 UTXO’s are outputs ready to become inputs for a new transaction recognized by a private key
2 transaction doesn’t construct ?
3 does it ?
4 create other wallets
Thank you for the intervention. When responding I was thinking that the sum of all UTXO is not large enough to cover for the transaction. Therefore the transaction would be declined. Re-reading the question and your answer, I realise I was not attentive enough.