Activity Lesson 4

Many investments in public schools are malinvestments when compared to other options. In Baltimore City, Maryland it costs $18,000 (1) per year to send children to schools where they do not even have proper heating in the winter (2). Compare the facilities and test results to a low cost private school started by an entrepreneur for less than half the cost per student (3). The savings are extraordinary when parents hold the power and not bureaucrats.

Source 1: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/03/30/baltimore-city-public-schools-promoted-student-with-013-gpa-while-spending-a-14-billion-budget/?sh=1dc03b163dcb

Source 2: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2018/01/04/outrage-baltimore-after-kids-huddle-freezing-classrooms/1004530001/

Source 3: https://reason.com/video/2017/01/23/thales-academy-north-carolina-bob-luddy/

1 Like

Investing in a CD/DVD music store like Sam Goody is a malinvestment. With the adoption of digital media, these type of hard copy music stores became obsolete. You can now get any music or movie online through a digital download or streaming service in an instant.

1 Like

Research an investment (could be a public company, private company, government agency, infrastructure project, etc) that you believe meets the definition of a malinvestment (past or present) and argue why you think it’s a misallocation of capital (3-5 sentences).
[/quote]

An example of a malinvestment would be Santander bank which in there car division is one of the biggest lender of car loans. They’ve given sub par car loans out like its candy running the risk of not being paid back. They were also known for delaying their reports of earnings due to “accounting errors” and were bailed when the market crashed. I believe its a misallocation of capital because they were not more restrictive with giving out loans when the economic crisis was taking place and they ended up losing money.

1 Like

A malinvestment for me at this time is keeping money in the banks. With low or soon to be negative interest rates eating away at the capital and the imminent threat of a bail in by the banks during another financial crisis. The sensible thing for anyone to do at this time is invest in precious metals and cryptocurrencies and not hold cash in the bank.

1 Like

The Philippines attempted to build a nuclear power plant in the 1970s. The Bataan Nuclear Power Plant became a major financial obligation with zero ROI. It cost $2.3B-- a pricey, unwise investment.

Even if the Chernobyl disaster did not happen at the time, I think this nuclear plant wouldn’t still have pushed through operations. It was built during a dictatorship, when corruption of the cronies was prevalent (still is, lol) and the quality of work done was always in question. Whether or not the country remained in dictatorship post-construction, operating a critical facility with uncertain quality would be catastrophic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bataan_Nuclear_Power_Plant

1 Like

I think a malinvestment is holding US dollars or any other fiat currency at this time. Govts around the world are printing trillions, the debt bubble around the world is growing at a staggering pace and they acting recklessly. At this rate a very real hyperinflationary situation is on the table

1 Like

Large scale public projects. Usually their completion takes longer than plan and they are mostly overspent than the initial budget. Needless to say the inefficiencies due to political interventions and losses due to possible corruptions or avoidance mechanisms of corruption.

1 Like

My hometown is currently attempting to expand a small section of the freeway to add two lanes of traffic, one for each direction. I would argue this is a malinvestment because the funds could be used for something more effective at alleviating traffic. While not a popular solution, the addition of public transit rail in this area would be a significantly more cost effective option in the long term.

1 Like

Malinvestment is to hold Argentine peso. Money printer is on and it devaluates each day.

1 Like

vertical farming as business model are misleading and claiming to solve food issue.

The technology is promising but its malinvestment because All what vertical farming can do right now is produce high priced leafy greens and hight priced products which is opposite of feeding people,humans needs great value not expensive food driven by high electricity bills, expensive rent and expensive labor.

They don’t tell investors or backers that its not yet ready for mass production instead they use the money to build big farms to feed high end restaurants where food is actually wasted let alone if the vertical farm actually survives

1 Like

I consider purchasing a new car to be a malinvestment. New cars lose over 30% of their retail value after only three years, which steadily declines every year after at a somewhat slower rate. Better to buy one three years old and save that initial 30%.

1 Like

Great article. Thanks for posting. Uber is my favorite example of another overvalued tech company.

  • The best example to me for a malinvestment was my savings account in the bank for over ten years. After all I paid more fees than what I got as interests.
1 Like

California’s high speed rail plan, connecting San Fransisco to Los Angeles is a shining example of a malinvestment and extreme government waste.

The “Trainwreck” of a plan was conceived in 2012. Construction finally began in 2015, three years behind schedule, with the completion date being pushed back repeatedly. The proposal started with a Tax-Payer price tag of $33 billion, then inflated in cost to $77 billion and may still jump to over $98 billion before completion. Some speculate it may never finish.

This tax payer money could have been put to much better use as California has the highest poverty rate in the US and homelessness continues to ravage the state.

1 Like

Well I’ve already been proven right by this but I always thought Quibi was doomed. I didn’t understand why they thought packaging television content as 5 minute webisodes was some sort of game changer. They took content for millennials, packaged it for Gen Z and expected both to love it instead of neither excepting it. Everyone loaded up money because of the big names attached but there was never any proof as to why anyone wanted the product.

1 Like

The Pacific Railway Acts of 1862 and 1864.

In 1862, the U.S federal government passed the first Pacific Railway Act providing cash subsidies, 30 year loans, and land grants to the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroad companies for the purpose of each building a railroad, the Union Pacific one going westward from Omaha, NE and the Central Pacific one going eastward from Sacramento, CA. Subsidies were paid out by mile of track laid. In 1864, the second Pacific Railway Act was passed on the premise that “more capital was needed to complete the project”. However, in 1869 after the project was completed, investigations by Congress revealed that the two companies had deliberately added excessive miles to their railroads in order to aquire more profit. I wonder how much more productively all this capital could have been invested had these acts not been passed and the private secter kept it in the form of a tax break, from either direct taxation or inflation?

My sources:
https://www.britannica.com/event/Pacific-Railway-Acts
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Central-Pacific-Railroad
https://mises.org/library/myth-great-railroad-meetup

As an American the number of malinvestments are astounding. There isn’t many investments that Washington D.C. invests in that benefit the American people. Washington D.C. spends a-lot of capital on foreign wars and to prop up foreign countries military, infrastructure, defense, ETC. with no return or benefit or every day Americans. But really history repeats itself or it may rhyme and it isn’t a coincidence, same tricks different country.

1 Like

Government loans to businesses are often a form of malinvestment. Private loans (from banks or individuals) are made to individuals or businesses based on the credit they posses, in other words they are offered a loan based on their repayment history, business acumen, marketable assets, character, past record, etc. When the government makes loans they do it because the individual or business they are lending to likely is unable to get a loan from private lenders. The government is more likely to lend to businesses and individuals who need bailouts or are charitable cases and cannot get the money from private sources. Additionally, because the government lends the money to an individual or business to purchase a property, farm, equipment, etc. this creates unnecessary competition in the marketplace where the individual or business with good credit may now be unable to make the same investment. In other words the government may likely have loaned money to a less efficient borrower at the expense of a preferable borrower with superior business acumen who would have borrowed through private means. As Henry Hazlitt puts it in Economics in One Lesson, “private loans will utilize existing resources and capital far better than government loans. Government loans will waste far more capital and resources than private loans. Government loans, in short, as compared with private loans, will reduce production, not increase it.”

2 Likes

All treasury bonds since they pay to you less than inflation, you literally have no chance to profit in this type of investment, unless you are trading this.

2 Likes

I think a good example of a very bad investment would have been Theranos. They claimed to have a blood test, that only needed a small amount of blood and could be analysed with the devices from the same company. But i turned out, that all of this wonderful promises were fake!
They raised of $700M and got a $10B valuation at its peak.
Now the founder, Elizabeth Holmes, has a trial going on which will take place this year 2021 in summer.
Investing in sth that looks too good to be true, seems a very big risk. I would have never fomod in untill they could hold their promises.

2 Likes